Community >> View Post
·
Post By
FreeKyle

Member Since: Thu Nov 11, 2021
In Reply To
zvelf

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Subj: Re: The pantheism/atheism debate
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 at 05:44:53 pm EDT (Viewed 157 times)
Reply Subj: Re: The pantheism/atheism debate
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 at 12:25:15 pm EST (Viewed 168 times)

Previous Post


    Quote:
    Yes, I read it you twit. It didn’t say all that extra stuff whether you’re right or wrong: that he has no power over its removal. Regardless, he’a still a washed up, brain dead loser with no morals or ethics. I’ve yet to meet an ethical atheist.


That's some nerve to call a moderator a twit.

This whole portion of the thread can be boiled down to FreeKyle believing in a very specific version of God (a Christian one) and any other versions of God or Gods outside of that doesn’t count. However, to atheists, they are the same: supernatural bunk and that includes pantheism. To FreeKyle, all religion but his own is bunk (it’s just that pantheism is the target of the moment). This just goes to demonstrate Richard Dawkins’ quote, “We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.”

As usual, well-argued, Ancient One.


Uh.. My definition of God is not specific to any God; my definition is the same as the dictionary’s.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/god

Funny enough, had you actually read the thread, you’d have seen that at numerous points the dictionary was one of Ancient One’s chief arguments.


Posted with Apple iPhone 15.3
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software