So now that you understand that Coyne’s position is the same as I described, your interpretation of his use of “often” was a fail. And yet, amusingly, even after acknowledging that Coyne is matching what I’m saying, you didn’t even think to scroll above in your post and immediately edit your claims that “I” was the one who failed in understanding his use of “often”. Laff - I never met an ethical atheist.
You're STILL misunderstanding his use of 'often' in the context he used it.
So tell me, IS it your view that often pantheism is different to atheism? Yes/No.
Quote:
Coyne, Dawkins, and I are all in agreement. It’s ironic that the atheist in this conversation is on the other side of the island wading through the dark and totally lost.
Coyne and Dawkins aren't right about everything. Certainly not on this.
Perhaps astronomers are better at understanding religious thought than evolutionary biologists?
Quote:
Lastly, I don’t need to hear an atheist tell me that he’s not a pantheist.
No, not if you can read.
Posted with Google Chrome 98.0.4758.80 on Windows 10